Hollingsworth LLP : Attorneys and Counselors
News : Latest News About Hollingsworth LLP
Home Firm Profile : An Overview of Hollingsworth LLP Practice Areas : Our Areas of Legal Expertise Cases and Verdicts : Find Cases Verdicts by Map, Jurisdiction, Practice Area or Reverse Chronology Technology : How Our Firm Uses Technology Seminars : Get the Latest Information on Our Seminars Recruiting : Find Out About Recruitment Practices Attorney Directory : Attorney Listings and Bios News : Latest News About Hollingsworth LLP
News

Litigation News
Events and Announcements

Search News by Keyword  

Search by Date  



Search >> 
Sitemap >> 
Contact >> 

1350 I St. N.W. 
Washington, DC  20005 
tel: (202)898-5800 
fax:(202)682-1639 

AD: Featured in THE NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL | July 12, 2010 | MIDSIZE HOT LIST


Court grants Firm client Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s motion to exclude testimony of plaintiff’s specific-causation expert in case pending in New Jersey Aredia® and Zometa® Mass Tort action.

On April 1, 2010, Judge Jessica Mayer, Mass Tort Judge for the New Jersey Superior Court in Middlesex County, granted firm client Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation's motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff’s case-specific expert Dr. Joseph Cillo. Click here to view the Order. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion. Walsh was one of two cases from which the first trial was to have been selected in the New Jersey Mass Tort for Aredia® and Zometa®. Novartis moved to exclude the specific-causation testimony of Dr. Cillo under New Jersey’s Kemp standard because he did not use a reliable scientific methodology to develop his opinion that Walsh’s use of Zometa® caused her to develop what he termed “Bisphosphonate Induced Osteonecrosis of the Jaw” and because his opinion was not supported by the record. Dr. Cillo purported to have performed a differential diagnosis in forming his opinion. He failed, however, to reliably rule in or rule out significant potential alternative causes of Walsh’s jaw problems. He also conceded at his deposition that Walsh’s dental condition did not meet his definition of “Bisphosphonate Induced Osteonecrosis of the Jaw” because her records did not document greater than eight weeks of exposed bone. The Court’s Order excluding Dr. Cillo’s testimony stated “Having reviewed the above motion, I find it to be meritorious on its face and is unopposed. Pursuant to R. 1:6-2, it therefore will be granted essentially for the reasons set forth in the moving papers.”

Contact
Katharine R. Latimer
(202) 898-5850
klatimer@hollingsworthllp.com
Recent News News Home Archived News
Copyright ©2002 - Hollingsworth LLP