The article highlights plaintiffs’ experts’ continued reliance on “one molecule” or “any exposure” theories in toxic tort cases and addresses several recent litigation developments signaling a growing demand for reliable, dose-specific causation analysis in ethylene oxide cases.
The firms earning the top rankings garnered client recognition for superior client service.
Aleksandra Rybicki and Olivia Sacks analyze a recent Ninth Circuit decision addressing the application of the learned intermediary doctrine to a patient seeing multiple physicians for the same condition.
Hollingsworth LLP partner David Schifrin will present on the expert, scientific, and evidentiary issues that drive PFAS litigation in a Barbri webinar on July 7, 2026
Given the escalating use of generative AI tools in the legal profession, the article recommends steps for counsel to consider when addressing an opponent’s court submissions.
This seminar brought together leaders from across the defense community to examine the forces driving increased risk and exposure, while identifying practical strategies to respond.
The Supreme Court’s opinion that the “relating to” requirement in 28 U.S.C. § 1442 should be interpreted broadly is an important development that provides a path to federal court for those who meet the necessary criteria.
Clients praise the firm for finely honed expertise and successful outcomes in the litigation space, at trials, and on appeal.
Congratulations to all of our super lawyers!
